Hong Kong court finds 14 pro-democracy activists guilty of subversion

World

A Hong Kong court has found 14 out of 16 pro-democracy activists guilty of conspiracy to commit subversion in a landmark case.

It is city’s biggest national security case under a law imposed by China that has all but wiped out public dissent, following widespread anti-government protests in 2019.

Those found guilty include former lawmakers Leung Kwok-hung, Lam Cheuk-ting, Helena Wong and Raymond Chan.

They could now face life in prison.

But the three judges approved by the government to oversee the case cleared two former district councillors, Lee Yue-shun and Lawrence Lau.

They were all among 47 democracy advocates prosecuted in 2021 for their involvement in an unofficial primary election.

A pro-democracy supporter shouts outside the court. Pic: Reuters
Image:
A pro-democracy supporter shouts outside the court. Pic: Reuters

Prosecutors accused them of attempting to paralyze Hong Kong‘s government and topple the city’s leader by securing the legislative majority necessary to indiscriminately veto budgets.

Ahead of the hearing, observers said their subversion case will illustrate how the security law is being used to crush political opposition.

But the Beijing and Hong Kong governments insist the law has helped bring back stability to the city and that judicial independence is being protected.

This breaking news story is being updated and more details will be published shortly.

Please refresh the page for the fullest version.

You can receive breaking news alerts on a smartphone or tablet via the Sky News app. You can also follow @SkyNews on X or subscribe to our YouTube channel to keep up with the latest news.

Articles You May Like

765 hp AUDI E ditches the four rings, keeps the sexy wagon aesthetic
NASA Data Empowers Global Response to Rising Sea Levels, Here’s What You Need to Know
What it’s like to fight (and lose) against UFC star Jon Jones
Gary Lineker to leave Match Of The Day
Streeting accused of ‘crossing the line’ over public opposition to assisted dying